tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1169281096117913024.post5424682637230353991..comments2024-03-27T04:14:38.477-05:00Comments on crAAKKer: Mind Reading at the MeadowsGrange95http://www.blogger.com/profile/01857460215043659894noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1169281096117913024.post-41533428030087741952010-06-28T23:06:39.873-05:002010-06-28T23:06:39.873-05:00I think PokerGrump might have commented on the deu...I think PokerGrump might have commented on the deuce-four versus crubs conundrum at one point or another . . .BWoPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02934781459474787598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1169281096117913024.post-10954762882365365182010-06-27T19:40:05.939-05:002010-06-27T19:40:05.939-05:00@ BWoP: That is correct. When I saw 4c2c, I natura...@ BWoP: That is correct. When I saw 4c2c, I naturally assumed my hand was invincible. I was quite confused when the pot was shipped to another player.<br /><br />I agree that additional testing is warranted. Also, tests should be run to determine what happens when the deuce-four is up against crubs. Sort of an irresistible force - immovable object scenario.Grange95https://www.blogger.com/profile/01857460215043659894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1169281096117913024.post-85959092671780077452010-06-27T19:24:53.260-05:002010-06-27T19:24:53.260-05:00So let me get this correct: You lost with a deuce ...So let me get this correct: You lost with a deuce four boat, but the crubs did get there with you had AA with Ac?<br /><br />Perhaps deuce four in combination with crubs negates their power . . . We may need to do some more testing.BWoPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02934781459474787598noreply@blogger.com