I've been slow-rolled before, of course. Play the game long enough and it will happen at some point (although being flat-out lied to on top of that was a new one to me). My question: what possesses people to act like that? Are their lives so miserable that the only way they can get any joy is by trying to give others a false sense of hope, just so that they can watch those other people deflate? Are they so insecure that they can only find any self-worth by tearing down the people around them so that they feel better about themselves?Consider these two scenarios I've recently encountered, and debate whether the player slow-rolled or not:
- During a recent eventful session at the Meadows ATM, I'm in the small blind, UTG player raises, couple of callers, so I call with JTs, and the big blind calls. Flop is J-7-3 rainbow, I check, UTG bets, I check-raise, BB and UTG call. Turn is a Ten. Donkey Kong! I bet, both players call. River is an 8, with no flush possible. I bet, BB calls, UTG raises! This perplexes me, since I put him on top pair good kicker or an overpair. I figure he would have played a set faster. There was a four-card straight on board, but I couldn't figure him for a 9, unless maybe 99. Finally, I call. Then, the BB snap-calls, which confuses me. We all sat there for a few seconds, and even though it wasn't my place to show first, I fear heat death so I finally shrug and say, "Top two" and roll over my hand. BB pauses, then shows 97o for the straight. UTG pauses a bit longer, looks at both of our hands, then finally rolls over ... Q9s for the nuts! I say something snarky like, "Wow, you weren't sure if a straight was good?" and mentally debate which of various medieval torture devices to use on the both of them. Anyway, the situation was rather annoying, and it has me rethinking my practice of showing first even if I don't have to in order to keep the game moving; being a nice guy isn't always the right play at the table.
- During a recent session at Riverside Poker Emporium & Donk-A-Rama, I found myself in a hand with a maniac who was playing literally any two cards, and doing some good-natured trash-talking. I had AA in the blinds, and 3-bet his usual button-raise; he came back over the top, and we got it all-in right there. Now, I usually don't show my hand on a preflop all-in, though it's not a hard and fast rule, and if someone else shows their hand and it's been a friendly game, I may roll mine as well so the table can sweat the hand. So, first question—is it wrong not to immediately roll over AA/KK in a preflop all-in? In any event, because this kid had been running like god, I didn't roll my hand. The flop came down A-Q-T with two to a suit. Yahtzee! I said, "That can't be good," half in jest, and half certain in a fatalistic way that the kid had KJ. The turn completed the flush. I looked at the kid and said, "That really is bad for me." Kid was silent, but looked at his cards. The river was an innocuous small card. I rolled over my hand as I said, "I doubt these are good." Kid looks at my hand and mucks, then asks, "Your hand was no good, huh?" Second question—Since I showed in turn and without delay on the river, was this a slow roll? Third question—Was my joking about not liking the flop or being behind out of line?
I am in BB with 73off and get to check my option. Flop comes 3-5-9. One small bet and Grange and I both call. Turn is 7 for my two pair and I lead out for $25. Grange comes along with a flat call that doesn’t feel right. Turn is a paint card, no flush. I think for a few moments knowing that Grange will raise a bet here whether he has it or not. I decide pot control and check to him. He bets $65. I sit and ponder, mumbling nonsense that he makes fun of. I decide he’s got either nothing at all or 7/5s for two pair. I call and say, “Do you have two pair?” He replies, “No…” and before I can let him finish I proclaim, "Well I do!" and flip up my hand. He then grins and finishes his sentence, “…no, I don’t have two pair. I have a straight,” And flips his cards over one at a time showing 6/4s.
Just for some background, Santa and I have this running joke where we imitate Sammy Farha, saying, "I have ... straight" in a dramatic tone with a bad accent. So, I was using that line when the showdown occurred. Also, I'm certain Santa was mentally preparing some taunt against me as he stacked the chips from the pot he was sure he had won. Oh yeah, he's a good friend.
So, where do you draw the line for what's ethically acceptable and unacceptable practice at the table? Consider these ethical questions:
- Does a player with the nuts need to show immediately at showdown, without regard for the order of showdown (thereby forfeiting his right to see his opponents' cards)? Or does slowrolling only occur if a player delays when it is his turn to show?
- Can a player with a strong hand pause to "read" his opponents' cards? What if he has the nuts; does he still get a moment to read his opponents' cards to see how they played the hand?
- Does the size of the pot matter; should a player get more leeway with a big pot while we are more strict with small pots?
- Is it OK to slow-roll for dramatic effect, as with quads or a straight flush, or with some kind of improbable winning hand?
- Is slow-rolling acceptable when the opponent has been a jerk in this hand? Prior hands? Has slow-rolled you? Has slow-rolled another player?
- Is it slow-rolling if another player asks if you have a certain hand (e.g., "You got an ace?" when an Ace is on board and he is clearly indicating a pair of aces is good), and you do not show that hand, even when you have it or a stronger hand (say, middle set)?
- Is slow-rolling OK if it tilts a player? After all it's not against the rules, and isn't poker about getting opponents to play poorly?