Showing posts with label Milestones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Milestones. Show all posts

January 21, 2011

Moving Along

Time, time, time, see what's become of me
While I looked around
For my possibilities.
I was so hard to please.
But look around, leaves are brown
And the sky is a hazy shade of winter.


—Simon & Garfunkel, "Hazy Shade of Winter"

My posts have been a bit sporadic the past couple of weeks, and they are likely to remain a bit sporadic into the near future. However, let me explain. No, wait, there's no time. Let me sum up.

After nearly 16 years as a lawyer—ten of them as a full shareholder—with my current law firm, I am leaving for another career opportunity. Yes, I have finally been offered a spot as a Wall Street hedge fund manager and international playboy.

Naww, it's nothing that exciting. Instead, I've gone corporate, taking a spot as "Vice-President and Assistant General Counsel—Litigation" for a regional insurance company. Essentially, my job will be half management (monitoring complex or high exposure claims, overseeing outside counsel, and supervising in-house attorneys), and half litigation (defending first-party claims against the company). The job will offer a lot of variety and interesting legal issues, which is nice, considering my current practice rarely offers much in the way of intellectual challenges. Also, the pay and benefits are much better, and the long-term financial prospects are substantially better than remaining at my current job. Plus, the commute is all of five minutes.

Now, there will be some downsides to the new position. I won't have near the flexibility in terms of taking time away from the office, and my first year or so will require a ton of work getting my feet wet. Also, I will miss all the good folks at my current firm, where I have made many friends over the years. But, in a way, as the firm has grown, it has of necessity become more corporate, which inevitably leads to changes—and tensions—in relationships. It's kind of like a home poker game. It starts out as a few friends having some drinks, laughing, and pushing chips around. Then a few more people start joining in, and eventually, you have 30 players, house rules need to be written down, people focus more on money and less on camaraderie, petty disputes morph into long term grudges, and other players look less like friends or neighbors than another guy with an ATM card that resets at midnight (never mind that he probably can't afford to lose any money). Don't get me wrong, business and poker are about money. But never kid yourself—when the stakes get high, money can be corrosive to even the best of friendships.

Thankfully, this opportunity knocked at a great time. I wasn't looking for a different job, but this position is an amazing career opportunity and an interesting challenge. More importantly, I'm able to leave my firm while still on great terms with all my friends. After another five or six years in the firm, I'm not sure that I could have guaranteed such a happy outcome.

I don't believe in fate, but sometimes, things do just happen for a reason.


(Image source).

January 07, 2011

I, Janus

 "Dogs at Cards" cake (image from here).

It's crAAKKer's first birthday! I'm not one for birthday cake, but I'll pass around some Templeton Rye ...

I began this blog a year ago with no real set-in-stone expectations. I knew it would be primarily poker-oriented (since that's my major hobby), but I didn't want to be limited by discussion forum stylistics. I wanted to be able to do some longer, more in-depth analysis of various issues, an ability I may have abused from time to time in these spaces (it's my blog and I'll prattle if I want). I also wanted to be able to branch off from poker into other issues of interest to me, which some of you may have found less than scintillating (it's my blog and I'll bore if I want). Mostly, though, I wanted a place to share some personal writing, and on that account, at least, things have worked out fairly well.

I installed Google Analytics early on to track site traffic, more out of curiosity than wanting to hit particular goals. At the one year mark, roughly 120 folks subscribe to my RSS feed, and there have been over 36,000 visits to crAAKKer by nearly 8,100 unique people from 87 countries. Not particularly huge numbers, but way above my modest expectations. So, thanks for reading, and I hope you keep coming back!

Also, digging into the data a bit more, a hat tip and sincerest thanks to my Top 10 referring blogs / websites:
  1. Poker Grump
  2. I Had Outs (#3 on its own!) / Dr. Clare's Electronicorium Emporium / Clareified
  3. All Vegas Poker
  4. Three Rivers Poker
  5. Two Plus Two Forums
  6. Pokerati
  7. Very Josie
  8. Life of a Poker Dealer
  9. Hardboiled Poker (Shamus)
  10. Lair of Lucypher
Each of the blogs in that list are ones in my RSS feed, and are entertaining or informative, and generally a good use of my limited casual reading time. I encourage you to give them all a look-see.

While we're data-mining, here are some of the zanier and more head-scratching search engine queries that led folks to crAAKKer:
  • Dutch minidress
  • Cheese PPA
  • Albarino telemarket
  • Bestiality blogspot (thus ensuring more hits from that search)
  • Dawn Summers birthday (people search for that?!?)
  • Hate Dawn Summers (I get that search)
  • How to kill a dealer (I get that one, too ...)
  • Eeyore sayings
  • Poker horror / Poker horror stories
  • Evil East Germans
  • Miniature stack of yaks
  • Antique dildos
  • Cat and sausage / Fun with cat and sausage
  • Mickelson 6'4" tall
  • Wife pokerslut photo
  • Fish sticks poker (Alrighty then ...)
Over the course of the past year, I covered a lot of topics, but here are a few of my favorite posts, and a few that my readers liked the most:


Humorous Poker Sessions:

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, "MadBrooklyn" World / "Dawn Summers" Does Des Moines

IMOP Memories:  The Beatdown at Bally's

Wine & Whine O' the Week (v. 1.11)—The crAAKKer in the Rye

How Phil Galfond Got His Nickname—A Poker "Just So Story"


Personal Posts / Social Issues / Random Stuff:

National "Whatever" Day

A Bad Beat Bakes My Noodle

Poker at the Gas 'n' Sip

The WSOP Ladies Event—A Modest Proposal

My Roots Are Showing—St. Matthew's Cemetery

The Absurdity of Poker


Poker Legal Issues:

Tilting at Poker Windmills

Why Poker Litigation FAILS

The Company Poker Keeps

The Emperor's New Sunglasses

Baxter v. United States—Landmark or Mirage?


However, I think my best contribution to the poker blogging world was probably my series of posts regarding the Rousso poker litigation in Washington state. Being a lawyer with a lot of appellate experience gave me a different viewpoint on the case than for most poker players, and I hope I was able to add something new to the discussion of Rousso in the poker community:

Poker's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Year (Part 2)—Rousso v. State of Washington

Recapping Oral Arguments in Rousso v. State of Washington

Down Goes Rousso! Washington Supreme Court KOs Constitutional Challenge to Online Gambling Ban

Justice Sanders, In the Conservatory, With a Con Law Hornbook

PokerStars Sells Out Its Washington Players

The PPA Throws in the Towel on Rousso v. State of Washington


Hopefully y'all enjoyed at least some of my posts this past year; please post a comment to point out your favorites that I overlooked. Thanks for reading, and drop by occasionally to keep track of crAAKKer II—The Donkeys Strike Back.

June 02, 2010

This Blog Goes to Eleventy-One

Nigel Tufnel:  The numbers all go to eleven. Look, right across the board, eleven, eleven, eleven and...
Marty DiBergi:  Oh, I see. And most amps go up to ten?
Nigel Tufnel:  Exactly.
Marty DiBergi:  Does that mean it's louder? Is it any louder?
Nigel Tufnel:  Well, it's one louder, isn't it?  It's not ten.  You see, most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten.  You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar.  Where can you go from there?  Where?
Marty DiBergi:  I don't know.
Nigel Tufnel:  Nowhere.  Exactly.  What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?
Marty DiBergi:  Put it up to eleven?
Nigel Tufnel:  Eleven. Exactly. One louder.
Marty DiBergi:  Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?
Nigel Tufnel:  [pause] These go to eleven.

This Is Spinal Tap


One of my readers emailed last week to tell me I had reached a milestone of sorts—100 blog posts.  I hadn't really thought much of it and hadn't intended to commemorate it, when it occurred to me that I could establish eleventy-one (111) as my base blog milestone.  After all, 100 as a milestone is just as arbitrary a number as 111, and I happen to have liked eleventy-one since I first stumbled across it in fifth grade while reading The Fellowship of the Ring (a major event early in the story is Bilbo Baggins' eleventy-first birthday party).  It really comes as no surprise that 111 has a variety of fascinating mathematical and "magical" properties, which should come in handy at the poker table.  Perhaps most important, 111 is a palindromic number, which gives me an advantage when pushing all-in against Santa Claus.

I installed Google analytics during the first week of the blog, and it's interesting to check in periodically to see how many people are reading my blog, and what they are reading.  There seems to be a core of 200ish of y'all that follow crAAKKer semi-regularly, but in total there have been over 2,200 "absolute unique visitors" (apparently unique IP addresses) from 43 countries and 893 cities scattered around the globe, making over 12,500 visits in total.  Nowhere near Poker Grump numbers, but a lot more readers than I had imagined this early in the process.

Although I expected such an intelligent and thoughtful bunch to prefer my lengthy "law & poker" posts, imagine my surprise to learn you actually visit for the poker candy in my IMOP and "hilarity ensues" posts.  There have been fewer comments than I had anticipated, most likely because my posts are always completely correct, but possibly because my posts are boring or non-controversial.  Or, some of my posts may suffer from "TLDR" syndrome (too long, didn't read).  But, my style is what it is, so if I feel a long post is appropriate, that's what you'll get. You certainly know you'll get your money's worth from crAAKKer!

One of the fun things I monitor are the Google searches that land people on crAAKKer.  Some of them are obvious ("yaks", "ironman of poker"), but a few are amusing or even head-scratchingly absurd:
  • "evil east germans"
  • "5s2s five seconds to safety" (surprise!)
  • "yoyo olympics"
  • "bestiality blogspot"  (just have to wonder about that query)
  • "david begnaud gay"
  • "fast booze"
  • "invasion of the nits poker"
  • "meadows gay poker"
  • "mickelson 6'4" tall"  (umm, OK ...)
  • "poker insults"  (our target audience, natch)
  • "tom dwans office"  (more important than his sexual preference!)
The blogging process itself has been an interesting learning experience.  Early on, I worried about running out of topics to write about, but I find I tend to have 3-6 blog ideas in "draft" form at any given time, waiting for me to return to them for fleshing out and publication.  Occasionally, I'll delete a draft post when I decide the idea just wasn't as interesting as I had thought, or I can't think of an angle to write about that hasn't already been covered by someone I follow elsewhere, or a draft simply goes OTBE (overtaken by events).  I would like to add a few more live poker session reports, or at least posts that spring out of live poker sessions, but my poker playing has been a little limited recently, and the sessions I have played just weren't all that inspirational or entertaining, for whatever reason.  But, I'll try my hardest to get a little more #hilarityensues back in crAAKKer over the summer; this blog truly is capable of going to eleventy-one!

In any event, thanks to everyone who has supported this little poker outpost the past five months, whether by reading, commenting, or shooting me ideas for posts.  I think my favorite author said it best:

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

—Bilbo Baggins in "The Fellowship of the Ring" by J.R.R. Tolkien